Monday, January 31, 2005

Thick Boy


Here's Harry's Dad Charlie pretending to be a decorated veteran (his mum gives him medals for his birthday, bless)

I decided against comment here on the recent furore over Prince Harry and his Nazi costume, but thought I would share this from the British satire magazine Private Eye which sums it all up (including the reaction) rather nicely (photos and captions are of my own choosing however, reflecting my rather ham-fisted approach and why I didn't bother to write anything):

THICK BOY DOES SOMETHING THICK


A dim young man did something stupid yesterday which he then regretted. (Reuters)
Timetable of disaster – the tragic event that shook the world
6.37pm: Harry receives phone call from Rupert saying he’s going to Bingo’s bash as a Zulu, which is going to be “a bloody good laugh”.
6.39pm: Harry rings Tasha who says she’s going as “a Chav” and it’ll be “a hoot”.
6.41pm: Jiggy rings to say that she is going as a “Penguin”, which will be “bloody funny”.
6.43pm: Prince William announces that he is going as “a lion”. No one thinks this is “a scream” at all.
6.45pm: Harry rings ‘Stupid Costumes ’R Us’ to find that Pongo has taken the last Ku Klux Klan outfit. “Bastard!”
6.48pm: Harry has brainstorming session.
7.48pm: Brainstorming session fails to yield results.
7.50pm: Harry goes to costume shop  to see what’s left. He chooses famous “Sound of Music outfit”. Tells Stiffy, “This’ll be legend.”
8.43pm: Harry arrives at Bingo’s dressed as Nazi. Chorus of “Boffo fancy dress, Hazza, you da man!”
8.53pm: Barfhead’s mate, Bogbrush, takes picture of Harry on mobile phone and sends to Sun newspaper.
8.59pm: Queen abdicates, as monarchy ends.


Here he is again, dressing up as a paratrooper despite having actually served in the Royal Navy

Exclusive to all papers


MONARCHY’S DAY OF SHAME



BRITAIN’s monarchy was today plunged into its worst-ever crisis, as fury mounted over the horrifying pictures that have stunned the world.
It is hard to recall a cataclysmic blunder of such proportions, which could well spell the end of the thousand-year rule of the House of Windsor.

Across the nation a sense of white-hot outrage swept through the entire population, as more and more voices joined the tide of protest.
Among the groups we contacted in the hope that they would be outraged were army veterans, Holocaust victims and OAPs who had lived through the Blitz.
Their verdict was unanimous. “We can’t see what the fuss is about,” they said.

YOU DECIDE! What should be done to the Nazi prince?

Should he:

A) be forced to make a public apology from the balcony of Buckingham Palace?

B) be strung up?

C) attend counselling sessions with Dr Germaine Greer?



Not realizing it was a costume party Chaz saves his bacon at the last minute by grabbing a pint and going as "a common person"

Friday, January 28, 2005

"Two Countries Separated By A Common Language" No More?

At the risk of damaging my fragile ego by piling post upon post without letting prior entries sit and stew long enough to be read and collect comment, I just felt the bubble of dawning realization burst in my head simultaneously with the urge to write it down before the gases of inspiration dissapated through the puddle of everyday thought.

I recently read Pretty Straight Guys by Nick Cohen (courtesy of the Bowles Memorial Mobile Library) and am currently reading What's The Matter With Kansas? by Thomas Frank. Both are well written social democratic polemics; the former deals with the betrayal of liberal and democratic values by Tony Blair's Labour government in Britain while the latter tackles the thorny issue of the conservative makeover of blue collar America.

What both books have in common is a central assertion that it is easier to attack cultural shibboleths and the whims of celebrities and politicians than it is to take on the true corruption of corporations. Hence the lack of blowback from Enron, Haliburton, Global Crossing (USA), Marconi, BCCI, or Polly Peck (UK).

Without wanting to sound as dogmatic and frankly silly as Chomsky and Zinn can, I recommend reading the above books, as well as Why Do People Hate America? and The Corporation for a depressing but also inspiring take on the reasons we face the problems we do today. As always, consider the source, but I'm sure you can glean more from these books than from the entire catalog of Anne Coulter and Mike Moore combined.

The Magnet Coda

History Friday must take a back seat once again this week as the great “Weasel versus the Yellow Ribbon Magnets” saga reaches its rather desultory conclusion.

For those of you who have been half-paying attention over the past couple of weeks, a post concerning my feelings around for-profit yellow ribbon car magnets drew a response from Micah Pattisall, Legal Coordinator for Magnet America (the largest producer of these things) which disputed the numbers I had drawn from a magazine article on the company he works for. I got back to Micah to ask a couple of questions based on the article, my math, and his message. Micah to his great credit took the time to reply in depth but sadly asked me not to reproduce his email on this blog.

In his message Micah makes a passionate and heartfelt case for Magnet America and its altruism, and I am inclined to take him at his word. I’m sure he won’t mind too much if I quote him just a little:

“I guess the main problem with your (argument) and that of most of the negative media swirling around these yellow ribbons, is the sweeping generalizations applied to Magnet America. I AGREE with you wholeheartedly that most of the companies that sprung up to jump on the bandwagon are doing it for one reason, the almighty dollar. They have little if any scruples and care even less about individual needs. So comments directed at “war profiteering” would in my opinion be accurate when applied to most other companies. But I think a short visit to MA would leave even the most hardened liberal realizing that we are a different company. We do care about individuals and we care nothing about “getting wealthy.”

Mea culpa: of my original post I think it can be said that I allowed the fires of righteous indignation crowd out my points and I unfairly categorized Magnet America as something less than wholesome. I also can’t shake off the image of “hardened liberalism” stalking the land with goatee, rimless glasses, beret, and Chairman Mao’s “Little Red Book” under one arm, sneering that all business represents the excess of capitalism and demanding the forced collectivization of magnet manufacturers. Let me say it in black and white, 12 point Arial, that Magnet America are not war profiteers, anymore than liberals are anti-business or unpatriotic.

What of the yellow ribbon? Watching CNN trail a story about the youngest female military fatality in Iraq tonight, I was struck by the powerful imagery of her family tying homemade yellow ribbons around their property in solidarity with the other families of the fallen and those still serving in combat zones around the world. In an ideal world, anyone who displayed a ribbon would be stating an apolitical message of caring and support. Alas, I cannot help but feel that for a significant number the ribbon has come less to represent shared concern but rather is now emblematic of a partisan position. Maine writer Jim Baumer relays a good letter by local celebrity “The Humble Farmer” (as the local bumper sticker says “The Humble Farmer is Neither”, but I digress) here that sums it all up nicely.

So in keeping with my New Year’s resolution to be more intellectually rigorous and less reliant on ideological shorthand I’ve refined my position on this subject:

a) The yellow ribbon in and of itself is not an indication of shallowness;

b) Only if one is also committed to advocating for veteran’s rights, soldiers’ general welfare, and a smarter (i.e. less dogmatic, more considered, and more finessed) foreign policy;

c) And that buying a ribbon does not mean that you feel that you have met your obligations as a citizen of a nation allegedly at war.

To my mind, it is still preferable to make a donation of the full retail price you were going to pay for a ribbon to service charities rather than rely on a commercial enterprise to cover a percentage of your giving capacity on your behalf so that you can proclaim your supposed patriotism to the world. If you feel the urge to buy a ribbon (of any color, for any appeal), at least consider giving an equal amount to the cause your purchase fractionally supports. Whatever happened to stoicism and reserve? I thought they were pretty good moral values, but perhaps that’s because I’m an English East Anglian who lives in New England. Perhaps my anachronistic values have finally lost the battle with vulgarity.

Here endeth the Magnet epic.

Whoops Missus! Gets Yer Doris Days Out, Pwhoooah!


I meant to get "His Girl Friday" but wound up with this
I have no idea what this entry's title means; it was just my gut reaction after reading this on the BBC web site this morning:

BBC NEWS: A devout Baptist couple who bought a Doris Day DVD from a supermarket were shocked to find a sex film instead.

Alan and Anne Leigh-Browne, from Wellington, Somerset, had been expecting to enjoy The Pajama Game.
Instead they were confronted by Italian sex film - Tettone che Passione, which translates "Breasts, What a Passion".
"Some topless young women appeared and started talking in Italian... it's not what you expect from a Doris Day film," Mr Leigh-Browne said........... "It was a pretty raunchy, explicit film, it certainly pulled no punches," Mr Leigh-Browne said.

"My wife and I were very shocked but we watched it until the end because we couldn't believe what we were seeing. The film became progressively more graphic, there was no plot to it, it was just sex."


Quite, Mr Leigh-Browne, quite. The rest of the story is here.

Foreign languages? Passion in the title? Devout baptists reeling in shock? I smell the hand of Mel Gibson!

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

We'll Keep A Welcome In The Hillsides...


Three Welshmen in national costume

No doubt this is only of interest to Mr. Bowles and me, but I spotted the following on the BBC:

No free kit for 'foreign' Welsh

A Welsh football club which answered an advert by an English businessman offering free shirts was turned down because Wales "is a foreign country". Flint Town United secretary Michael Beech was shocked by emails sent from Surrey-based Victor Gladwish saying he did not sponsor "foreign" teams.

The company, Gladwish Land Sales, had advertised sponsorship of non-league teams in a football paper. Mr Gladwish said he did not do business in Wales.

Michael Beech, who took over as secretary of Cymru Alliance team Flint Town this season, had spotted the advert in the Welsh edition of the Non-League Paper offering home and away strips for one team from a league.

He emailed Mr Gladwish for more information but received the following reply:

"Sorry, we do not sell land in foreign countries so do not do footy teams in foreign countries."

Mr Beech replied: "Why, what country are you doing this offer in? We are in the UK."

He was stunned by Mr Gladwish's reply, which read: "UK ended when the Labour government made Wales independent. Thousands of soldiers died unifying the countries. We do not sell land in Wales. You have Welsh on your Land Registry documents and as an ex-soldier I object."

When Mr Beech pointed out Wales was British and followed British laws, he responded: "I am English and you are Welsh".

Mr Beech told BBC Wales: "I'm not annoyed by the fact he said no. If he had emailed me back and said you are not within our catchment area, that would have been fine. It's the way he was (attacking) the Welsh. We're not foreigners in Wales. We're as much a part of the UK as Horsham in Surrey [Gladwish Land Sales' base] is. I think other people would be annoyed about it and rightly so. It is an insult really. I have lived in Mold for 14 years. I was born in Chester but my house is not a little outpost of Chester. As far as I'm concerned, I live in Wales and I act like the Welsh."

Mr Gladwish, who has put about £1m into non-league football sponsorship, including the Conference League Cup, told the BBC it was "up to me who I give away things to, and I do not sell land in Wales."

He has sponsorships involving around 25 non-league clubs in England.

He added: "Wales is in Europe and the [football] World Cup as a nation so either you are part of England or not, you cannot have it both ways. For the state of the union ask the Labour government - they created your assembly three years ago [the assembly was actually set up in 1999]. Any further discussions and I will support UEFA and FIFA in expelling Wales from their competitions. Make your minds up."


See? We have millionare sports lunatics of our own: we don't need no Malcom Glazer carpetbaggery.

Why The Soviet Union Collapsed


My cool looking but crappy watch

I have a thing for Soviet iconography. Not Leninism, not Stalinism, not Communism in general but rather the aparachniks' interesting design sense and use of symbols and color. I won't bore everyone with the details of my collection here except from noting that my current wristwatch is a Vostok "Tank Commander" model as pictured above. It is also the one of the worst watches in the world.

It looses about five minutes every hour and every morning and night at 11:30am and pm it stops completely (the second, minute, and hour hands meet in a sort of perfect storm and get all tangled together). The instructions are in cyrillic and it took me about 2 weeks to figure out how to set the date. The back of the watch and the strap buckle are made of some sort of metal that on particularly dry days makes my wrist itch and flake (knowing the Russians, its probably asbestos lined lead with a plutonium chaser).

The only consulation I have in all of this is the knowledge that my friend Boss Hogg's Rolex keeps even worse time; thus we have a triumph for the workers over the plutocrats, comrades!

(This is such a typical self-referential blog entry, but I should indulge myself from time to time).

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Dirty War




Nuff respect to Listmaker for letting our blogonauts' lounge know about Dirty War a BBC drama-doc that aired on HBO last night. The film deals with the build up to and aftermath of a radiological bomb attack on London by terrorists and I highly recommend you see it. Knowing HBO it will be re-run 38 times over the next 7 days and I imagine that before long it will be out on DVD.

If you want to know more about why the film was made, the BBC has extensive (and not too self-promoting) features here: The Making of "Dirty War"

Perspective is the key in watching these things, and those of you who choose to live in Brooklyn or London probably have more of a right to get highly freaked out about this than those of us in more rural areas. Then again, you also have restaurants that are open past nine at night, so you have to take the crunchy with the smooth I'd say. For me, this film was not as literally nightmare inducing as Threads was when I was 12, (but then again, I am no longer 12 or living on a primary Soviet target- thanks dad!) but it still had it's moments. Will it change anything? Will it make us safer? Of course not, but its a better disaster movie than Atomic Train.

Still, if you really want to persist in thinking that there is something you can do to protect yourself or that it is vital for society that you survive any attack as the world would be so much poorer without your blog/band/knowing irony/cool t-shirt ideas then visit this agreeable pile of earnest nonsense for tips.

Monday, January 24, 2005

Where Weasels Dare



A Welshman and a cowboy walk into a German bar...

Something from Saturday’s blizzard:

It’s Saturday night, and as the Brooklyn coterie can testify, the snow is falling once again. The 8 inches we got on Wednesday night will soon become at least a foot, and the thermometer reads 10 degrees. Sometimes it’s almost possible to think that coastal Maine is the dead ringer for the German Alps. All of which reminds me of my childhood (natch).

As a kid of 8 I moved to Gutersloh, FDR with my family thanks to my father being in the Royal Air Force. Unlike the flatter-than-flat Oceanic weather system coddled English region of East Anglia where I was born and grew up, Germany seemed like a mythical white Christmas from November to March, with snow, skiing, mountains, and spruce forests as far as the eye could see. Some of my favorite winter memories are rendered in the scenery of North Rhine Westphalia and the furthest east NATO base, with the backdrop of the Cold War and the Soviets “watching us watching you watching us”. Every TACEVAL* siren could signify the end of the world as we knew it, and it was in equal parts deathly exciting and nightmare inducing. It certainly triggered my interest in international relations.

The base where we lived had been Herman Goering’s headquarters during the Second World War. There was even a room in the turret of the spectacular Officers’ Mess that used to be his private drinking club; favored pilots would be invited to down schnapps with him and listen to his Ace claims from the First World War. Goering had stated, “If I lie, may the beams in the roof bend”. Skeptical Luftwaffe pilots of the 1939-45 vintage sawed through the beams, inserted pulleys, and bent them at will whenever the Reich marshal spoke. No record exists of whether or not they avoided Dachau for their gag.

I have such vivid memories of Germany, although they appear to be selective with the seasons. Most are recollections of winter, which may be a result of my ten years in the basso-Canadian state of Maine. My Dad and brother almost decapitating a young fraulein with a sled; a most excellent hot chocolate and whipped cream concoction bought for me at the Monhe Dam (617! Guy Gibson, you fantastic Nazi slayer, you) by a young civilian lawyer named Greville Janner brought in to defend someone at a Court Martial; Lindt chocolate and icy sidewalks; some douchebag named Marcus trying to beat me up at recess (I have never trusted a Marcus since); and trips to Winterberg to look in pre-pubescent wonder at the ski-jump and bob-sled run built for an Olympics that never came.

The other superfund of childhood memory is of course Christmas; a month past but no less vivid in this immigrant’s mind thanks to all the snow that renders my puritan kingdom in the monochrome of a black-and-white Santa movie. It’s falling now outside my window with an unnerving insistence and eerie silence.

So, snow makes me think of Germany, which makes me think of winter, which makes me think of Christmas. All of which adds up to the memory of watching the fantastic Where Eagles Dare, screened every year at Christmas in a fabulously twist-the-kinfe-in-the-Germans move by the British Forces Broadcasting Service.

Memories of Nazi tyranny are brought to vivid life by the invasion….of a movie company (from the MGM publicity film included on the DVD).

Where Eagles Dare tells the story of a team of 6 British commandos, an American Ranger, and a winsome English female agent on a seemingly suicidal mission to rescue a captured American General (and D-Day planner) from the fearsome Schloss Adler high in the Bavarian Alps. Nobody is quite who they seem, and a series of plots and counter-plots spin around a collection of derring-do stunts and lame blue screen shots. As with all 1960s war films, it is riddled with logical and historical inaccuracies, and like the best of the genre you really don’t care even on the thirtieth viewing.

“Its certainly unusual, to be wearing war uniforms as opposed to ponchos and Stetsons and so forth” Clint Eastwood.

While most of the cast fall into that great catalog of actors who never went anywhere, there were two bona fide stars that have an oddly compelling chemistry that at first glance shouldn’t work but does. The man with no name plays the US Ranger and Richard Burton is the team leader. They are hardly Martin and Lewis, but their repartee passes and Clint’s obvious believable action star status more than makes up for Burton being a little too portly and long in the tooth for an ace super spy. But there are some fabulous implausible moments.

First, Clint is obviously still coming off his spaghetti western roles (as reflected in his quote above). For a man facing down spandau gunners and stick grenade throwers, he stands tall in the doorway, blasting his MP-40 down the hallways of the castle as if he is chewing a cheroot and blasting away at Eli Wallach with a peacemaker. And while undercover as a Nazi soldier, Eastwood has to be the most un-German looking white man alive. Together with Burton, he also depicts one half of the most conspiratorial and devious looking “blending in” secret agent team ever to hoist a stein in a German Army bar.

The real champion of resolutely refusing to play any character other than himself however was Richard Burton. Overweight with a fantastic pompadour, he declaims his lines with no regard for the actual situation his character is in (“Broadsword calling Danny Boy”, the oft-repeated radio call sign to the controllers in London, is delivered with the diction of a reading of Under Milk Wood) and waddles through the action scenes like a 50 year old man jogging on the first day of a New Year’s resolution. There are so many scenes that had me breaking my covenant with suspended belief to giggle that if I were to list them all this entry would rival My Life by Bill Clinton for length, but one is illustrative of why Burton’s chutzpah in this role has to be seen to be believed.

Picture the scene: Burton is fleeing down a castle corridor with the remnants of his team and some prisoners. The German’s are right on his tail, spraying hot lead around the narrow passageway. In the real world we would be looking at perforated spies. Clint is shooting his machine gun single handed and unaimed, picking off Germans like flies (who die with the sixties “aieeeee” death scream). Just as the team slips through a heavy wooden door a high velocity 7.62mm bullet hits Burton’s hand. Again in reality, this shot would have our hero facing many months at Walter Reed and probably a prosthesis, but luckily for Burton this heavy round that can penetrate a 6ft thick oak tree just grazes his thumb. “Damn and blast!’ our erstwhile Welsh warrior exclaims, and then, from the pocket of his German ski trooper disguise pulls his handkerchief to wrap the wound. For me that encapsulates the wonderfully silly adventure of this movie; only in Burton’s world would it seem perfectly normal to think to pack a monogrammed snot rag on a super secret mission deep behind enemy lines.

So next time it snows, or if the gents out there score a bachelor weekend, I highly recommend grabbing a six pack of fine brews, plugging the speakers into the TV, and settling in for a night of Where Eagles Dare.

Broadsword calling Danny Boy- over and out. And scene.

(*TACEVAL: as you may have guessed, “Tactical Evaluation”: an exercise in which my father doffed Air Force blue for cammos, grabbed his Stirling 9mm, and effectively practiced committing suicide against Soviet Spetznatz commandos. As a rifleman, my Dad is a great engineer.)

Friday, January 21, 2005

History Friday... On A Saturday




Seeing as Iran is in the news (damn, I wish I had written my long-threatened "great game" analysis* BEFORE Seymour Hirsh published his revelations about planning for offensive operations against the nuclear mullahs) this week's History Friday casts its beady eye at the conclusion of the second of four defining processes of our current imprisonment in the concrete overshoes of the Mid East (the other three being the Six Day War, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and our reaction to the OPEC embargo after the Yom Kippur war that saw us take a renewed interest in keeping the oil suppliers friendly). Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the:

End of the Iranian Embassy Hostage Crisis

As the BBC reported:
January 21, 1981: Tehran frees US hostages after 444 days
The 52 American hostages held at the US embassy in Tehran for more than 14 months have arrived in West Germany on their way home to the United States.
The former diplomats and embassy staff stepped from the plane onto the tarmac at Wiesbaden airport looking tired but elated after their 4,000-mile (6,437km) flight from Iran.

Some waved to the crowd of well-wishers who had gathered, others gave the V-for-victory sign.

Iran finally agreed to release the hostages after the US said it would release assets frozen in American and other banks, including the Bank of England, since the embassy was seized.


Tying in with one of my recent bugbears the hostage crisis marked, if not the first use then the widespread adoption of the yellow ribbon as the badge of recognition of Americans detained overseas. I believe its meaning was transformed to recognize overseas military deployments with the first Gulf War, and has reached epidemic proportions since 9/11.

* This is my theory: one of the lesser objectives, happy coincidences, or strategic opportunities that arose from US actions in Afghanistan and Iraq is that the true and long held Mid East enemy #1, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is now wedged uncomfortably between two potential US client states. Remember, we felt Iran was a sufficient threat to arm Saddam for a decade. Indeed, from a military strategic standpoint and a "War on Terror" perspective Iran made a better target than Iraq in 2003.

From a neo-con perspective, this presents the US with a mixed bag of opportunities and problems. As the nut between the crackers, Iran might succumb to a popular, anti-fundamentalist revolt (although speaking personally I feel it cannot be stated loudly enough that Iranian reform movements should not be confused with pro-US elements; they might like us as people and might like coca cola but they don't care for the US government and they remember the Shah), it might become ripe for plucking by US military assault (this remember is what I posit as US policy in the early days of Iraq, not in the overstretched nightmare it has become), or it might be vunerable to an Afghanistan style operation with local forces and Special Ops troops quickly toppling the mullahs (although I think you would have to use a mixed Iraqi/Us force from the west and a mixed Afghan/US force from the East as there seems to be little evidence of an exile army in waiting- perhaps Iranian Kurds?) Problems include the rapid drive towards nukes (probably sped up by the same realizations I'm noting here), the loose cannons of Iranian sponsored terror elements (Hizbollah, etc) outside its borders, and alienation of Iraq's restive Shia population.

So that's my long held theory. I really am wasted in the field of adolecent development....

More on Magnets

Further to the rant about magnetic yellow ribbons, I received the following message from Micah at Magnet America:

Hi,
Saw your blog about Magnet America. We gave more than 50% of our profits to bonafide charitable causes (Freedom Calls, Autism Awareness, Relay for Life, and many more) in 2004. Based upon your passion, I am assuming you would want the truth.

I don’t agree with your conclusions, but it makes for interesting reading. We don’t have to all agree to get along. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, “It takes all sorts to make a world.”

Regards, Micah


Fair play to them; its nice at least to see a modern company prepared to defend its corner with anything other than stony silence. Therefore I'm going to get in touch with Micah and see if he can give me more details and walk me through the math (I'm still hung up on a $45,000 donation off a million magnets sold not being 50% of profit, unless they have a spectacularly inefficient production and distribution system. I'm sure Micah will endeavor to explain to a thickie like me). I shall report the results later.

As Micah notes, its a good thing that we don't all agree, and so I'll state again, simple logic dictates that it is better for you to make a 100% donation to a charity for the price of the item you were going to buy that gives 50% of net profits.

Once again, if you buy something you are ensuring that less money than you are capable of giving is going to the cause you care about. The same goes for AIDS ribbons and Lance Armstrong bracelets too, by the way. All you are saying is "I need to be bribed with a trinket to do good."

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

How Did We Live Without These?




Stumbled across these via my ISP's new news portal:
Star Wars: Collecting | Darth Tater & Wookiee Soaker: New Star Wars Toys

I thought a Wookie Soaker was a particularly perverse sub genre of German porno until I discovered Smirnoff*. These are kitschy cool, but I'm waiting for the collectible The Woodsman Mr. Potato Head.

(*For those who don't know, 'I thought accountancy was my life until I discovered Smirnoff' was the tag line for a sixties vodka ad, adapted by British wags to fit any improbable life situation. As in "I thought Dante's Inferno was an Italian sports car until I discovered Smirnoff." Hear endeth the lesson.)

Small Disappointments Light My Way

A small personal blow yesterday; as I expected my column for Maine's Face magazine was added to the kull of hinterland based writers by the new, Portland-centric editorial team. A quick call to my esteemed writer/editor Richard assuaged any feelings of personal inadequacy but all the same I feel a little done in by regional publishing politics after faithfully churning out my column for five years for Face's various incarnations. Still, while I'm having a wee bit of trouble believing the mantra "a door opens when a door closes" this does at least free me up to work on my resolution to strive for the evolution of my writing style, away from the Bertie Woosterish "Englishman abroad" dreck that my Face column so often became.

I finally got to see Goodbye Lenin last night. A bittersweet film that brought back a flood of memories of my pre-teen years in Germany (and in particular a life defining trip "behind the wall" in 1984) as well alas as a darker memory of summer 1990. In the film one of the sub-plots is the march of the German national soccer team towards World Cup glory, and a two second clip of England's Chris Waddle skying a penalty over the bar that sent us crashing out of the semi-finals against Deutschland put me in a rather regrettable funk that somewhat spoiled the rest of the movie. How ridiculous that a sporting trifle effected me so badly 15 years on; I think embarrassment at my own instinctual over-reaction informed my lightly foul mood.

Perhaps that clip triggered the bubbling swamp of memories of my 18th year on this planet- a time of great emotional and life change for me. That game was a defining moment of my teenage years, out of all proportion to real life, and paradoxically was part of one of the greatest summers ever, where many contracts of friendship(with people like Mr. Bowles) were indelibly inked. Who knows?

Behold the manchild- too easily troubled by the small and unmallable, not big enough to have a sense of proportion.

Monday, January 17, 2005

Don't Believe the Hype


Don't worry Peyton. Real grass is much softer than astroturf.

Despite the fact that they are a bunch of millionaire mercenaries hired to play a kid’s game, I do love those New England Patriots. They are not heroes, or supermen, or even particularly suitable for emulation as role models, but they did the sports world a huge favor on Sunday by silencing Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis Colts 20-3 in the cold and snow of my beloved New England.

As the white stuff piled up in my dooryard I watched in quiet satisfaction (it wasn’t one of those yelling, shouting games) as the Pats iconoclastically ripped up all the stupid hyperbole spewed all season by second rate sports hacks without an original thought in their heads about the ‘greatest living quarterback ever ever ever.”

Here’s the deal about Peyton Manning. He plays in a rec center on plastic grass. He plays in a division that seemingly was cobbled together with an eye to showcasing his narrow range of talents. He plays for a scab team that deserted its loyal fans in Baltimore. He’s probably a Republican. He has a gigantic head that is probably full of crawdads and barbeque sauce. He has a last name for a first name. His dad is a smug douchebag. His little brother is a crybaby whose only saving grace is helping his NY Giants lose. The previous single season touchdown pass record holder Dan Marino, of the evil Dolphins, at least played outdoors for most of his games against notably tougher opposition (he still looked like a cheese steak on rusted roller skates when he tried to run, but that was the game then).

My favorite Peyton Manning story isn’t particularly tasteful, but to my mind it’s very funny, especially after a few beers. My great friend Boss Hogg is from Georgia and used to be a regular attendee at University of Georgia football games with his friend “Mr. X”. One year Boss Hogg and Mr. X attended the Georgia vs. Tennessee game and happened to be seated behind the Manning family who were in front of the famous hedges on the sideline. After the game (a Georgia victory) Tennessee quarterback Peyton Manning came over to visit with his family. At this point a rather liquidly relaxed Mr. X started yelling in a thick hick Georgia accent “Hey Peyton! I fucked your mama!” over and over. Archie Manning then tried to leap the hedge to fight Mr. X, got tangled up, and turned puce and swore his head off. Stadium security removed Boss Hogg and Mr. X to the cells below the field. Brilliant art terrorism or pathetic hooliganism? You be the judge.

Of course, in truth, my beef isn’t with Peyton Manning, however over-rated I feel he might be. As in all things, it is with lazy and unthinking journalism. The lads at “Fighting Words” (see links bar) did an excellent job dissecting this disease around the death of former Green Bay Packer star and virulent homophobe Reggie White. It is the acme of contempt for your audience and your craft when as a journalist you take the easy, uncritical herd position around an athlete, Hollywood star, or politician. To my mind, it is the job of the journalist in a democracy to challenge your audience to think, to be the gadfly, the skeptic, and contrarian. After all, the apathy and flummery that begins in the sports pages and the hagiographic Hollywood rags trickles through to the front page soon enough, and the public discourse finds itself dangerously denuded by a torrent of personality based profiles and press releases as unchallenged news.

Not every season produces a hero. Not every election produces a champion. Not every event follows the pre-determined script.

Friday, January 14, 2005

The Return of History Friday

With all the chaos surrounding the end of the year, I feel I have been neglecting my regular duties and failing in my remit to provide education and erudition. let nation speak peace unto nation and so on. So it is with a glad heart I announce the return of History Friday.

January 14:
Happy Birthday to Stephen Soderbergh, Andy Rooney, and Mrs. Weasel's ancestor Benedict Arnold. Mrs. Weasel's family also claims descent from Jefferson Davis, giving her the perhaps unique distinction of being preceded by two of America's least popular historical figures. It must be like being Malee Pot. Did I just compare my lovely and fragrant girlfriend to the daughter of a Cambodian mass murdering dictator? Surely not.

The Birth of the Ponzi Scheme

"For 20 years, Ponzi bounced from job to job, always dreaming up a way to make millions but never coming close. But in 1919, he came up with a new plan. Ponzi told friends and potential investors that they would get a 50 percent return on their money within three months if they invested with him. The hapless investors were never told much about what Ponzi planned on doing with their money, but, when pressed, he told them that it had to do with international postal exchange coupons, an obscure field that virtually no one knew much about......

Such a scam, known as a pyramid scheme, inevitably explodes, as it did on August 13, 1920, when thousands of investors demanded their money back. Ponzi, anticipating the collapse, had already taken $2 million to the Saratoga casinos in a vain attempt to make up the lost money. Ponzi went to jail and was deported to Italy in 1934. He told reporters, "I hope the world forgives me."

Perhaps taken in by his apparent contrition, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini gave Ponzi a high position in the government's financial sector. However, human nature is very difficult to change, and Ponzi eventually embezzled funds from the country's treasury and escaped to Brazil, where he died in 1949...."

These days this kind of scam is known as Social Security Reform.

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

Tie A Yellow Ribbon 'Round The Old Windfall Profit


At least they are only flogging yellow ribbons on the backs of soldiers, not smokes
(For those coming to this post from a link, feel free to read it but also the updated story here)

Its a funny old world. Who would have thought that a crappy and improbable pop song about getting out of pokey and getting some lovin' would find itself the inspiration for the late 20th/early 21st century equivalent of the Victorian sailor's wife's widow's walk? Somehow (and I suspect the dark forces of the Oprahization of western culture) the central conceit of a song about a horny convict has become a badge of stoic patriotism. Tie a yellow ribbon, indeed.

Of course, its the perfect symbol for our war on terror. Sitting up there in a point-of-purchase display at the gas station, supermarket, and pharmacy the yellow ribbon allows one to show solidarity with the troops (although I suspect that they would prefer that we forgo our tax cuts so that they can get armored humvees) while not having to a)spend a lot of money or b) actually do anything meaningful. In this modern age, merely admitting to feelings is apparently the moral and societal equivalent to buying a War Bond or saving scrap metal to make into B-17s.

Heaven forbid anyone in this country (or increasingly back in the UK) pause for a second to consider what an empty gesture buying a yellow ribbon actually is. The rigorous anti-intellectualism of our culture permits therapy (either the expensive in person kind or the Wal Mart version of Dr Phil) but not introspection around one's motives for action. A yellow ribbon is designed to be displayed; on one's property, lapel, or vehicle, and therefore is supposed to signal "I am a conspicuous patriot; what's your problem, you Osama lover in the Prius?"

What buying a yellow ribbon really means of course is that the purchaser is a shallow, silly, individual with the intellectual processing power of a Commodore 64.

I don't consider myself a particularly vigilant shopper (although Mrs. Weasel is encouraging it despite the fits it causes in the grocery when I realize that my favorite corned beef hash is an environmental nightmare) but I did pause to look at the $3 car magnet yellow ribbons on sale at our local supermarket recently. Of my $3 spent "to support the troops" I saw that 10% of it would go to "military charities" (unspecified) and that the ribbon was made in China. Mrs. Weasel was off in the detergents so I took the time to do a little math. Given that the store probably "keystoned" (double wholesale) non-grocery prices the ribbon cost them $1.50. Now, making the reasonable assumption that the donation was made by the wholesaler not the retailer, the military charities would receive 15c a ribbon, the store would pocket $1.50, and the Cantonese ribbon machine would continue to produce the outsourced symbols of our patriotism. I did what any curmudgeonly thirty-something would do and wrote a note to this effect on the back of the grocery list that I then left on the display for the other shoppers.

I didn't think of this little peeve of mine (the above took place about a month ago) until Mrs. Weasel brought home an interesting one page profile from People or US Weekly or similar of the two gents from North Carolina who came up with the magnetic car ribbon idea: Dwain Gullion and Chris Smith. These two public spirited chaps have sold over a million of the magnets (their ones are made in the USA, although their website doesn't say where or by whom. I bet its not a union shop though) at between 55c and $3 a piece. They reached for the stars and named their company "Magnet America". The article states:

"Magnet America donates a portion of their profits- at least $45,000 so far- to nonprofits that support soldiers."

OK, math time. Lets be conservative and say that they sold just 1 million magnets at their lowball price of 55c. The gross profit in that case would be $550,000. A donation of $45,000 is just over of 6% of gross sales. And remember, to maximize tax deductions, a business is allowed to take the deduction on the gross not the net. If even half the magnets were sold for the top end price of $3, the gross profit would be $1.5 million. If we then assume that those 500,000 $3 magnets correspond to half the donated $45,000, then the proceeds on those decals donated to service charities amounts to 1.5% of gross profit. As Gullion himself said in the article, "We just wanted to help the troops in Iraq." Indeed. North Carolina is a fairly military state: perhaps Magnet America can put wounded and maimed veterans to work making yellow ribbons to "support" their comrades still fighting in Iraq.

At the end of the article, it states: "Soon Gullion was swamped with orders, and he and Smith are thrilled about that (sic). 'It's a patriotic thing,' says Smith. 'People like to show what they believe in.'" Apparently Mr. Gullion and Mr. Smith believe in war profiteering.

By the way, if you want to visit Magnet America, their website can be found here. It's very enlightening: you can also see how they create opportunities for enriching themselves through the misery of cancer, domestic abuse, and religion.

Sidebar: what a sad illustration of the pandering and pathetic nature of the American media this article is. Apparently nobody cared to do the math when preparing this report; helping the magnet adorned saps in the gas guzzling, GI killing SUVs feel good about themselves is much more important than asking real questions of public interest. What a shame on us all this tame media of empire is.

If you really want to "support the troops", forgo that yellow ribbon that was produced overseas or helps fill the pockets of war speculators and instead send your three bucks directly to a service charity. Then your patriotism can be represented as it should be, as an internal force for good rather than a showy and sham piece of kitsch on your bumper.

No Tomb or Casket Can Keep Him In


Behind the Movie Myth: The Real and Very Dangerous Sta-Puff Marshmallow Man

Funny things happen after a Republican wins (or holds on to) the presidency. For example, have you noticed the trend towards zombie movies or references when the GOP is in the White House?

Night of the Living Dead- 1968, Nixon
Michael Jackson's "Thriller" video- 1983, Reagan
28 Days Later, Dawn of the Dead (remake, as the original was made under Carter and blows up my facile theory), Sean of the Dead- 2000's, Bush Jr.

See? The GOP equals zombies. No amount of pounding the stake through the chest of a right wing canard can allow one to rest easy. The foolhardy and the suicidally brave are the only ones who assume that logic, reason, humanity, and rational thought have vanquished the dark age mentality of zombies, spectres, and golems. All the book learning in the world won't protect you when walking past a red state at night.

And as if to prove it Newt Gingrich, the other doctrinaire and chubby right winger with a close lesbian relative, ethics issues, and ties to big business, is shaping up for a run for the presidency in 2008. My first thought was that this was some clever tie in with VH-1's new season of I Love The Nineties but the fat, dying wife abandoning, bad sex scene writing, air travel tantrum thrower and ex-speaker appears to be in deadly earnest. Either that or he's really committed to promoting that new book.

As part of our committment to see ourselves as others see us, lets see what Pakistan's Daily Times has to say about a Gingrich run in 2008:

Gingrich for President
"WASHINGTON: Trailblasing ideologue Newt Gingrich, who engineered the 1994 Republican takeover of the US House of Representatives, said on Sunday he may run for president in 2008, promising to fight what he calls “an Islamist insurgency against the modern world.”"

To quote the Prince of Pop:

Darkness falls across the land
The midnite hour is close at hand
Creatures crawl in search of blood
To terrorize y'awl's neighborhood
And whosoever shall be found
Without the soul for getting down
Must stand and face the hounds of hell
And rot inside a corpse's shell
The foulest stench is in the air
The funk of forty thousand years
And grizzly ghouls from every tomb
Are closing in to seal your doom
And though you fight to stay alive
Your body starts to shiver
For no mere mortal can resist
The evil of the Gingrich
Ha ha ha ha .....

Friday, January 07, 2005

What Unites The World's Religions? Nutjobs and Douchebags


Yea verily, sometimes I chooseth to be a right bastard

Do you remember when the charmingly rotund Jerry Falwell and his hair and teeth pal Pat Robertson blamed the attacks of 9/11 on gays, loose women, Democrats, and the new state quarters? It was only a matter of time before the intolerant wrath of some higher power was invoked to explain the Indian Ocean earthquake/tsunami. This time however (at least not out loud, only through a failure to raise relief funds on his TV show) it was not Robertson and the Religious Wrong in this country that have been pouring ire on the heads of the victims, but various Muslim clerics, politicians, and journalists. Thanks to the news translation site MEMRI we can read the words of Falwell's spiritual brethren from the Muslim side of the divide:

Saudi Professor Sheikh Fawzan Al-Fawzan: Allah Punishes for Homosexuality and Fornication at Christmas

"Some of our forefathers said that if there is usury and fornication in a certain village, Allah permits its destruction. We know that at these resorts, which unfortunately exist in Islamic and other countries in South Asia, and especially at Christmas, fornication and sexual perversion of all kinds are rampant. The fact that it happened at this particular time is a sign from Allah. It happened at Christmas, when fornicators and corrupt people from all over the world come to commit fornication and sexual perversion. That's when this tragedy took place, striking them all and destroyed everything. It turned the land into wasteland, where only the cries of the ravens are heard. I say this is a great sign and punishment on which Muslims should reflect."

Sexual perversion and fornication at Christmas? I must be celebrating wrong. Still, I suppose it gives new meaning to 'stuffing the turkey'. Also, I am a little surprised that Falwell and Robertson have so far passed up this opportunity to be offensive bastards by claming that the tsunami was the world's largest mass baptism gone awry (have that one free on me, reverends).

More horrifically laugh-or-else-you'll-cry religious insanity in ths vein can be found here: MEMRI: Conspiracy Theories Surrounding the Tsunami: It was a Punishment from Allah for
Celebrating Christmas and Other Sins; It was Caused by the U.S., Israel, India


While I have your attention, my latest effort for the New York Canaries soccer website is up; just scoot over to "The Maine Man" column to read the whole thing. Finally, here's how I hope my God works and thinks:

Please tell me this is a whoopee cushion

Thursday, January 06, 2005

Simon Pegg, Comedy Superhero?


Step Aside Citizen, its Man Man

I left England before the much acclaimed TV show Spaced came on the air so my first encounter with comedian Simon Pegg was via the brilliant Sean of the Dead. I was listening to BBC digital radio over the ole interweb the other day, and the aforementioned Mr. Pegg was a guest on a game show. Asked to come up with a superhero, he provided two; Man Bat (a bat who dresses in an ill-fitting human costume and fights crime with his sidekick Wonder the Boy Robin) and this one, a superhero who almost had me spitting oatmeal on my keyboard in drawers wetting laughter:

"Man man: a man who was bitten by a radioactive man and who now has the powers of a man."

Priceless.

Wednesday, January 05, 2005

People Need To Let Go Of Their Money Once They Decide To Do Good

This story below from the New York Times is a logical codicil to Listmaker's comment on yesterday's post in that the determination by a donor that he or she knows better than the non-profit professional where need is greatest and how money should be spent is a reflection of the need to feel control over ones surroundings as the world seems to spiral into chaos.

Here's the story:

Contributions: Giving for a Cause, and That Cause Only:

"Amid the rush of generous donations to the disaster relief effort in southern Asia, more donors have insisted that their gifts go exclusively to help those victims, charities say, building on a trend seen after the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

"People are very emotional, and they want their money to help the people that they see in pictures and on TV," said Thomas Tighe, president and chief executive of Direct Relief International, which distributes free medicine, supplies and equipment in an effort to improve health care around the world. "They make it clear that this is not about tragedies that exist elsewhere in the world, and they're very skeptical about how charities use their money.".....

...Last Wednesday, Doctors Without Borders posted a message on its Web site telling donors that it had collected as much as it would need to play its role in this disaster and inviting them to donate to its efforts in other places, including Sudan and Iraq. The organization collected more than $50 million to aid victims of the tsunami, and it was one of the first groups to express concern that the torrent of money flowing to southern Asia threatened to divert money from other needy locales.

The American Friends Service Committee's Web site initially offered donors the option of contributing to its general fund or a crisis fund that it maintains to respond to emergencies. Once the organization had decided it was going to respond to this disaster, it added a checked box beside a line at the top of its online donation page saying, 'I know that my contribution to the AFSC Crisis Fund will be used to help the survivors of the earthquake and tsunami in Asia.' Donors who do not want to contribute to that crisis must opt out.

Private charities report that a vast majority of donors for disaster relief fulfill their promises to deliver money - unlike governments, apparently. While the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs has applauded the more than $2 billion pledged by governments to date, it has also pointedly noted that experience suggests that some of those commitments will not be fully honored."

On the one hand the money is pretty much guaranteed to come in if privately raised. On the other (and I speak from experience from the non-profit field) restricted grants often lead to greater bureaucratic cost and increased paperwork (due to having to report to donors that every cent went to the narrowband area of interest they decided to fund) than unrestricted money which moves naturally to the areas of greatest need. I suppose I shouldn't grumble: I get paid to deal with that paperwork and reporting so the more individuals and foundations add restrictions to their donations, the more work I'll have. Its just a pity that the money folks like me at larger NGOS get paid to handle the forms-in-triplicate isn't going to feed and clothe people, eh?

Still, if donors want to play God and decide which region of the world gets to live or die, I suppose that is just another reflection of the "moral values" the lumpen mass of the electorate hold so dear. I suppose that attitude is a logical facet of having "a personal relationship with Jesus" (although I recommend you do a google search and see how Jerry Falwell's church and other conservative Christian groups with global reach are reacting to the tsunami).

There also is something very Victorian about it. The idea that stern and disapproving donors out there are watching my non-profit peers and me like hawks to ensure that not one penny given to help the poor of the parish go to either the poor of the next parish nor to the charity workers to ensure they don't wind up as the poor of the parish is quite Dickensian. Perhaps next they can stipulate that with every food pack, or blanket, or prefab home an NGO delivers there must be an improving text and a polemic about the evils of masturbation included.

To quote "Sir" Bob Geldof, organizer of the 1985 transatlantic Live Aid concert:
"People are dying. Just give us the fookin' money"

By the way, blogger's spell check queries "Falwell" with "Valueless"

Tuesday, January 04, 2005

Will the Tsunami Change Humankind? Notable Brits Give Their Opinions




In the comic book Watchmen the hero/antihero of the story plans a disaster on an incomprehensible scale in order to avert a nuclear showdown between the USA and the Soviet Union and to unite the world through compassion and relief efforts. Even as an acne riddled teenager I always had an issue with that conceit of both the character Adrian Veidt and by extension the writer Alan Moore. Surely after a disaster in New York, even one of an apparent extra terrestrial nature, would only be seen by the Soviets (as they were built up in the book) as an invitation to attack a weakened America? Would even the worst calamity unite a world for more than ten minutes?

After 9/11 we had a horrific real-life example of the Watchmen climax and a chance to see which version of events- the hopeful or the cynical- would prevail. As with all things humans get involved in it was a messy combination of both. Petulance about Bush 'blowing it' by not reciprocating the held out hands of friendship and by exhorting Americans not to sacrifice but to shop only tells half the story (the half I highlight when feeling blindly partisan). Why should other countries rely on the USA for leadership, on things like this, Kyoto, and so on? I think in many ways an inept and unlikable US adminstration is less a block on global unity but rather the convenient excuse for inaction (the same applies to my lefty friends who complain "he asked us to shop not sacrifice' and then do exactly that; buying toys instead of supporting the causes the purport to hold dear. As mother always says, if he said stick your head in the oven, would you do it?).

Every country must choose to interact within the global community via a triangulation of self-interest, partnership building, and enemy creation based on a calculation of relative strength and national need. Hence, along with the $350 million in aid to tsunami affected countries, the Bush Administration is using this calculated generosity to remind the world that this is America helping Muslims (poor Colin Powell; he's always being made to look so gauche) and to pointedly cut out the UN from administering our money (although the UN hardly have a watertight case for leadership here. Maybe Kofi's reforms will make it easier for thinking people to wholeheartedly endorse internationalism again).

In this story from the Independent various British notables opine in a tragically pessimistic but I fear all too realistic manner about the possibilities for new paradigms in human and international relations following the tsunami:

Could the tsunami disaster be a turning point for the world?

Perhaps the best summary comes from Stephen Tindale, the Executive Director of Greenpeace:

"It seems churlish to say it, but while it's relatively easy for most of us to give £50, it would be much harder for us to make the changes in our modern lifestyles that are needed if we are to move to a fairer world."
MainePages.com